On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:33 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: > On 2013-11-29 14:21, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:22 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: >>> On 2013-11-21 22:10, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >>>> hi fellow packagers, >>>> >>> >>> any takers for reviewing pd-iemlib? >> >> Sorry, missed this. >> >> - Any particular reason you want to duplicate the pd cdbs snippet in >> this rules file? > > the only reason is, that the package doesn't use cdbs... > if need be, i can switch the packaging system from dh to cdbs.
It doesn't *need* to be.. but I think most pd object are using cdbs, so maintaining a consistent style is useful. Plus, the rules file would be shorter ;). >> - The delay resulted in a new Standards-Version being available :(. >> Please update this too. > > are you sure? > i already followed 3.9.5, and i haven't found 3.9.6 anywhere... Meh, my mistake. Lintian complained, and I assumed a new policy was available... when in fact lintian is too old to know about 3.9.5. Sorry. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
