On 11/21/2013 04:41 AM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > * IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> [2013-11-21 10:37]: >> it's always best to follow upstream as closely as possible (as long as >> they make sane assumptions :-)), esp. in picky areas like SONAMEing. >> >> if your package has not been in debian yet (which i think is true), >> you should get rid of any hacks like renaming SONAME, as long as this >> is still easily possible. > > We are not renaming the SONAME but adding one in the first place ;). > > Cheers Jochen
Including a description of the issue in the patch would be quite helpful. It looks like the upstream version has a SONAME since it ends in .so.2. To add a desciption just add this at the top of the patch file: Description: renaming file to match our SONAME Upstream doesn't set SONAM blah blah blah... .hc _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
