Hi, I wonder if anybody who has tried the new workflow of merging in the upstream history could share their impressions on it? I'm considering using it, but some questions arise:
1. How to manage stripped upstream taballs? do we not care about shipping upstream code in git that we bother to strip in the debian source tarball? 2. Managing patches: it looks to me like the new workflow makes it better to make changes directly to the sources (by cherry-picking the appropriate commits/ merging the appropriate debian-specific branches) and setting single-debian-patch in local-options. Has anyone tried this? 3. Resolving conflicts between upstream released tarballs and the upstream git repo (possibly due to autogen files). Simply override anything with the contents of the latest tarball? I believe this is what gbp does, but not sure. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
