On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Stepan Golosunov <ste...@golosunov.pp.ru> wrote: > 07.07.2012 в 18:30:49 +0200 Reinhard Tartler написал: >> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Stepan Golosunov <ste...@golosunov.pp.ru> >> wrote: >> > 07.07.2012 в 11:57:47 +0200 Reinhard Tartler написал: >> >> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Stepan Golosunov >> >> <ste...@golosunov.pp.ru> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > libavutil-extra-51, libavdevice-extra-53, libavfilter-extra-2, >> >> > libpostproc-extra-52, libavformat-extra-53 and libswscale-extra-2 are >> >> > Multi-Arch: foreign transitional packages. >> >> > >> >> > This allows the packages to satisfy dependencies of >> >> > foreign-architecture packages while providing only libraries for >> >> > a native architecture, which is obviously incorrect. >> >> > >> >> > Transitional library packages should be Multi-Arch: same (but that >> >> > would require making them Architecture: any). I guess these packages >> >> > should just be removed, as the only non-transitional versions of the >> >> > packages still existing in Debian are uninstallable 4:0.7.2.1~bpo60+1 >> >> > packages in backports and obsolete 4:0.7.2.1+b1 armhf on debports. >> >> >> >> Well, AFAIUI this is a good reason to defer this for after wheezy >> >> release. Is there anything we can do about this issue for wheezy? >> > >> > What's "this"? Existence of the packages in backports? >> > They became uninstallable when libav 0.8 was uploaded to backports >> > months ago. (In any case, libav-extra source package probably needs >> > be removed from backports.) >> >> Yes, AFAIUI such removals happen on a regular basis without needing to >> file a bug. > > But libav-extra still hasn't been removed despite being uninstallable > for months.
I've cc'ed the backports team. Dear backport maintainers, can you have a look what's going on here? > >> BTW, libavformat-extra-53 from bpo is perfectly installable for me. >> Can you elaborate why they are not for you? > > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libavformat-extra-53 > > There are two versions of libavformat-extra-53 in backports. One from > libav-extra and one from libav. The first one is uninstallable as > there is only one version of libavcodec-extra-53. The second one is > a transitional package. (The obsolete libavformat-extra-53 probably > still exists because the transitional one is Architecture: all.) err, the first one is superseeded by the one built from the source package 'libav'. It is uninstallable because the newer packages has a higher version number. Can you please explain the problem again? > % zgrep -A10 'Package: libavformat-extra-53' Packages.gz > Package: libavformat-extra-53 > Priority: optional > Section: libs > Installed-Size: 2108 > Maintainer: Debian multimedia packages maintainers > <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> > Architecture: i386 > Source: libav-extra > Version: 4:0.7.2.1~bpo60+1 > Replaces: libavformat53 > Depends: libavcodec-extra-53 (>= 4:0.7.2.1~bpo60+1), libavcodec-extra-53 (<< > 4:0.7.2.1~bpo60+1-99), libavutil-extra-51 (>= 4:0.7.2.1~bpo60+1), > libavutil-extra-51 (<< 4:0.7.2.1~bpo60+1-99), libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.7), > librtmp0 (>= 2.3), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) > Conflicts: libavformat53 That's the superseeded one and should get removed. > -- > Package: libavformat-extra-53 > Priority: optional > Section: libs > Installed-Size: 68 > Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers > <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> > Architecture: all > Source: libav > Version: 6:0.8.3-1~bpo60+1 > Depends: libavformat53 > Filename: pool/main/liba/libav/libavformat-extra-53_0.8.3-1~bpo60+1_all.deb > Size: 40658 I cannot testify an installation problem with this package. >> > If the transitional packages are to stay, the correct way to proceed >> > is either to change them to Multi-Arch: same, Architecture: any or to >> > remove their Multi-Arch headers. >> >> Err, they (i.e., all but libavcodec-extra-53, and that's critical) are >> already Arch: all, with Multi-arch: foreign. Do I understand you >> correctly that they should rather by Multi-arch: same? > > Yes. Now in testing apt-get allows installing, for example, > minidlna:amd64 on a system with i386 dpkg without installing > libavformat53:amd64, as the > Depends: libavformat53 (>= 4:0.8-1~) | libavformat-extra-53 (>= 4:0.8-1~) > is satisfiable by libavformat-extra-53:all and libavformat53:i386 > combination. To recap, what's the problem now? -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
