On Mo, 2012-06-04 at 11:11 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am 27.05.2012 23:25, schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > > Please share your opinions and ideas! > > Such a bad idea that noone bothers to reply?
Last time I checked vo-aacenc did not support more than 2 channels and also only the low-complexity AAC profile while faac supported more. Creating a wrapper library that claims to be faac but does not support these features sounds like a bad idea.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
