On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote:
> A few minor things I've noticed:
>
> BitsFrom says LV2 version whereas Policy/LV2 says version 3.

Squeeze supports LV2-rev3, Wheezy currently provides LV2-rev6, I've
fixed that sub-page.

> "New [ladish] packages are currently available in Debian unstable" - and
> also in testing now.  Should we adjust or perhaps better simplify to not
> mention explicitly migration status: Subject is "planned for Wheezy"
> which covers it.

I've made some adjustments, please review.

> "[LAME is...] in the main distribution, without having to resort to
> unofficial repositories." Seems unnecessary to mention unofficial
> repositories, as they are not "the main distribution".

Mmm.. no, I don't agree, I'd like to highlight the point: "Happy news
guys! LAME has joined Debian, hence as of now you don't need to rely
on dmo anymore!" :)

> How about a section on our team growing, perhaps explicitly mentioning
> major additions like Blender?

Why not? ACK from me!

-- 
Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to