On Jan 13, 2012 9:25 AM, "Andres Mejia" <mcita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2012 6:40 AM, "Alessio Treglia" <ales...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > > > Should the packages get built twice, once without optimization for the debug > > > package and once with optimization for the actual shared library package? Or > > > is it necessary to disable all optimizations in the ragular shared library > > > package in order for the debug package to work? > > > > Actually the default -g -02 would be the best, -03 > > -fomit-frame-pointer (and other optimizations) should be stripped out, > > I think. > > I prefer leaving upstreams optimizations intact. Anyone wanting to debug these libraries can just build them from sources and install them to some temp location (their home directory for example). > > I personally don't bother with any dog packages.
*dbg packages. > And please leave the default optimizations for libbluray. > > > -- > > Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com > > Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org > > Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com > > 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
