On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: libav > Version: 4:0.8~beta1-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi! > > There's now a libav binary package in experimental, which ffmpeg > transitions to (due to the upstream change). The thing is that I > initially got pretty confused by the name, and on a quick glance > thought it was a metapackage for the shared libraries(!). > > In any case given our current conventions naming a tools/utils package > libfoo seems pretty confusing in general, and I'd not expect to find > those there. Could you consider renaming the package to something like > avtools, avutils, or similar maybe? Although the second might not be a > good choice as it could be confused to be related exclusively to > libavutil.
Would 'libav-bin' or maybe 'libav-tools' be better? I'm not really convinced by 'avtools' and 'avutils', as both seem pretty generic to me. 'libav' was chosen to follow the name change of the project 'ffmpeg'->'libav'. -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers