FYI, here's the answer from debian-release: On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 22:01 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:43 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I was just checking in on my packages, it seems that pd-hid is caught in > > unstable for 75 days, but I can't figure out what the issue is. The > > error message is "Adding pd-hid makes 1 non-depending packages > > uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64: pd-hid " > > > > http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=pd-hid;expand=1 > > > > But what is that 1 non-depending package? Is it 'puredata (<<0.43)'? > > No, it's pd-hid, as the message you quoted indicates. > > > Other packages with that same Build-Depends are already in testing. > > Also, buildd seems to show it as installed on kFreeBSD: > > That only indicates it builds, not that it's installable. > > edos-debcheck is one method of demonstrating the issue: > > $ edos-debcheck -explain -checkonly pd-hid < Packages_kfreebsd-amd64 > Completing conflicts... * 100.0% > Conflicts and dependencies... * 100.0% > Solving * 100.0% > pd-hid (= 0.7-1): FAILED > pd-hid (= 0.7-1) depends on one of: > - pd-mapping (= 0.2-1) > > $ edos-debcheck -explain -checkonly pd-mapping < Packages_kfreebsd-amd64 > Completing conflicts... * 100.0% > Conflicts and dependencies... * 100.0% > Solving * 100.0% > pd-mapping (= 0.2-1): FAILED > pd-mapping (= 0.2-1) depends on missing: > - pd-cyclone > > $ dak ls pd-cyclone > pd-cyclone | 0.1~alpha55-3 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > pd-cyclone | 0.1~alpha55-3 | unstable | source, amd64, armel, i386, > ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > > Regards, > > Adam > >
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
