On Aug 10, 2011 3:18 PM, <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > > libmp4v2-2_1.9.1+svn479~dfsg0-1 > > Honestly, I consider it complete bogus to repack an entire tarball just to > get rid of a few kB of unrelated Windows source files. AFAICT these are > not even binary files with dubious license or similar. > > Has this been coordinated with someone? > > - Fabian
At the very least, modifications to any upstream tarball should be coordinated upstream. Imho, I consider all files used by any build system or IDE that is included in a source tarball to be licenced under the same terms as the source package unless stated otherwise. _______________________________________________ > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
