On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 19:52, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: >> >> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here are my lowest priority uploads, but I hope to get them uploaded in >>>> time >>>> to be included in Ubuntu/oneiric. An easier fix to all these RC bugs >>>> would >>>> be to get someone to upload the 'puredata' package from >>>> collab-maint/puredata.git. IOhannes and I have been asking the >>>> maintainers >>>> to upload for weeks, but they are unresponsive. So perhaps an NMU would >>>> be >>>> appropriate. >>> >>> What are the changes in puredata? Is there a bug filed? >> >> >> I'm speaking on behalf of the work of IOhannes here, so it might not be >> entirely correct. IOhannes did the work to split puredata into many >> packages, including puredata-dev. For a transition plan, the new puredata >> was supposed to depend on puredata-dev, so that the old Build-Depends would >> work. That didn't happen, so now all of the existing packages don't build, >> since the headers are no longer installed when you install puredata. >> >> The bugs were then files against the packages that no longer build. I've >> fixed all of my packages to work with "Build-Depends: puredata-dev | >> puredata (<< 0.43)" >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629700 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629702 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629705 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629706 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629708 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629710 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629711 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629791 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629718 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629796 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629799 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629802 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629779 > > Uploaded pd-bassemu, pd-boids and pd-beatpipe. More to follow if I can > manage...
Better late than never, I uploaded the rest. Hans (and IOhannes), please do (on all your pd-related packages) depend on puredata | pd, since depending on a virtual package means the default version is determined by alphabetical order. Better make it explicit. Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
