On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:23, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/3/8 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 23:32, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 2011/2/25 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >>>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 20:59, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 17:46, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> 2010/10/31 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>: >>>>>>> Package: wnpp >>>>>>> Severity: wishlist >>>>>>> Owner: pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Package name : supercollider >>>>>>> Version : 3.4 >>>>>>> Upstream Author : Lots of people >>>>>>> * URL : http://supercollider.sourceforge.net >>>>>>> * License : mostly GPL, some BSD, CC-BY-SA-3.0 >>>>>>> Programming Lang: C++ >>>>>>> Description : A real time audio synthesis programming language >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SuperCollider is an environment and programming language for real time >>>>>>> audio synthesis and algorithmic composition. It provides an interpreted >>>>>>> object-oriented language which functions as a network client >>>>>>> to a state of the art, realtime sound synthesis server. >>>>>> >>>>>> OK, status of the supercollider packaging. Here's what I wrote on 4th >>>>>> jan (re a patch to add versioning to the soname): >>>>>> >>>>>>> The patch is in, upstream. What's happening right now is we're >>>>>>> preparing a 3.4.2 release, which will include this patch. (release >>>>>>> candidate files are at >>>>>>> <http://sourceforge.net/projects/supercollider/files/Source/3.4.2/>) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The neatest thing is to wait for 3.4.2 official release, then import >>>>>>> it to the deb-mm repo and tweak the scripts for .so.1. Should be soon! >>>>>> >>>>>> Since then, there's been some delay in supercolliderland due to >>>>>> debating garbage-collection issues in the development branch. We can >>>>>> either wait more, or apply the patch downstream, in which case it >>>>>> would I think be ready for others to try? What's the next step once >>>>>> we're OK with the packaging? >>>>> >>>>> Since the patch is already applied upstream, and we are likely to wait >>>>> a while before 3.4.2 is out, it should be OK to apply the patch >>>>> locally to 3.4.1 for now. Please do that, and update the packaging >>>>> accordingly. >>>> >>>> Ping? >>> >>> OK I've had a look at this tonight. There is a scons problem, which >>> lintian handily discovers for me. (Hooray lintian! I think.) >>> >>> The patched build script creates symlinks such as >>> libscsynth.so->libscsynth.so.1.0.0. However, when scons is installing, >>> it doesn't install a symlink but copies the file contents. Therefore >>> instead of one lib file and one symlink, we get two identical lib >>> files - and lintian correctly reports this as an error. >>> >>> I've been trying to find a way to convince scons to do the right >>> thing. I pushed an experimental branch to the git named >>> "scons_soversion" where instead of creating a symlink and asking scons >>> to install it, we add a symlinking command that should run during >>> installation. The problem is, that scons (v1.2.0) uses python chdir() >>> when running commands, which jumps it straight out of the DESTDIR and >>> tries to install in the system /usr/lib rather than the current build >>> tree. So I can't find a way of getting scons to create the symlink >>> during the install step AND inside DESTDIR. One or the other but not >>> both. >>> >>> If anyone can offer suggestions I'd be grateful. >>> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/scons_soversion >> >> It seems to me that the problem you are having is because your >> debian/rules uses the --install-sandbox option instead of the >> handcoded (by upstream) DESTDIR variable handling in SConstruct. > > Interesting... > >> I've pushed a commit to that branch that apparently solves the issue. > > Great, works here, thanks. > > Someone else started the supercollider packaging (on ubuntu) and he > had reasons for going with --install-sandbox. He is bcc'ed here - > Artem please send me (or deb-mm) a mail if you have objections. > > I'll merge that branch into master, and send the change upstream (for > inclusion in 3.4.2).
Remember to include the change in master as a patch instead of directly modifying SConstruct! -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
