On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 18:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > hey all, > > I'd like to start packaging some of the interactive documentation projects > for Pure Data. Currently we are using the pd-* prefix for Pd libraries, now > I am wondering whether we should have a separate prefix for Pd > documentation. I think there are currently four projects that I'd like to > package: pd-msg, playnow, messageoddness, pddp tutorials. > > So these are not like -doc packages because they are standalone projects not > associated with a lib or app. They are more like books, but they are all > interactive, runnable scripts. I could see these names: > > > pd-msg > playnow > messageoddness > pddp-tutorials > > -or- > > pd-msg-doc > playnow-doc > messageoddness-doc > pddp-tutorials-doc > > > Here are some similar packages that I found: > perlprimer-doc > rubybook > > Thoughts, suggestions, comments? >
I would keep the pd- prefix on these packages, and just append a -doc suffix. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
