On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> The upload would be:
>>
>> version-N+dfsgX
>
> It had better set something similar to:
>
>       version-N~dfsg
>
> This makes us able to drop the ~dfsg component if upstream will decide
> to release another DFSG-clean tarball in future.

Ahhh, that makes sense.

Just for my own personal education here ( since I'm still learning ),
will dpkg fail if:

1.0-1+dfsg3

not get overriden by:

1.0-2

( I used 3 to try to force the condition that I'm thinking about )

>
> Cheers.
>
> --
> Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com
> Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org
> Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubuntu.com
> 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
>

Thanks so much!
-Paul

-- 
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.

#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to