On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 20:19, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:26 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:50 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 14:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:17, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:15:05AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> pd-cyclone is a huge library of all sorts of objects that are > > >> >>>>> clones of > > >> >>>>> objects in Max/MSP4.5, Pd's proprietary cousin. It also includes > > >> >>>>> utilities for importing Max files. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> pd-cyclone is a long-form dh package that is a wrapper to a very > > >> >>>>> complicated Make build system. pd-cxc is in > > >> >>>>> git.debian.org/pkg-multimedia. It is a library without depends > > >> >>>>> that > > >> >>>>> are new packages. It builds on my i386, but it did not build on > > >> >>>>> the > > >> >>>>> launchpad amd64 build machine, it died on this error, which has > > >> >>>>> stumped > > >> >>>>> me: > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> dpkg-genchanges -B -mUbuntu/amd64 Build Daemon > > >> >>>>> <bui...@titanium.ppa> > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> ../pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1~maverick_amd64.changes > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including > > >> >>>>> arch-independent > > >> >>>>> packages > > >> >>>>> dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file > > >> >>>>> or > > >> >>>>> directory > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> It looks odd to me that you use no debhelper tools in the > > >> >>>> binary-arch > > >> >>>> target - only in the binary-indep one. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Thanks, that was the key. This now builds on i386 and amd64 and is > > >> >>> ready to go. > > >> >> > > >> >> The git repository is not fixed. > > >> > > > >> > I am not sure I understand. What I see on git.debian.org is the same > > >> > as what > > >> > I have on my machine, and I used git-buildpackage to make the source > > >> > package > > >> > to submit to Launchpad: > > >> > > > >> > http://launchpad.net/~eighthave/+archive/libdirs/+sourcepub/1362005/+listing-archive-extra > > >> > > >> Oh it was fixed, my bad. But there is a large commit that changes many > > >> things at once (d634143), and the change was hidden there. > > >> > > >> > > > >> >> Also, why do you use long-form debhelper? > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Because I didn't see a way to do it with short-form. This library has > > >> > a very > > >> > elaborate build system that I've tried for years to figure out. > > >> > Instead > > >> > I've found the best way is to wrap it into something more > > >> > understandable, > > >> > and long-form seemed the easiest way to do that. > > >> > > >> Indeed, the makefile is quite convoluted. It also can't handle it when > > >> the user passes CFLAGS and other variables. Also, it sets -j4 > > >> unconditionally. > > > > > >> On further inspection, the package seems to bundle the pddp source. > > >> Are riddle, sickle and ViCious more code copies? We should not use > > >> code copies. We need to avoid using them. > > > > > > This is how cyclone is released. The code in 'pddp', 'riddle', and > > > 'ViCious' are unused. The 'pddp' code shared some code with pd-pddp, > > > but not all. The code in 'sickle' is fully part of pd-cyclone and used. > > > > OK. Are you willing to look into a switch to cdbs (using long-form > > debhelper does not make much sense, and I personally prefer cdbs over > > dh)? I have pushed a cdbs branch to the git repository for you to look > > at. If you are willing to give cdbs a try, we can merge into the > > master branch and I can continue the review and upload. > > I just checked out it, it looks more straightforward to use cdbs for > pd-cyclone, so I say go for it! One thing I noticed is that there isn't > a Build-Depend on cdbs. >
OK. I'm kind of swamped right now, I think around tuesday I'll be able to get around to this. I'm sorry for the delays in uploading some packages. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
