On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 20:10, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote: > On 2010-11-04 22:51, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >>> Yeah, it is annoying for sure. The problem is that this particular object >>> is widely used and has been distributed and used like this since 2003ish. >> >> Can't it be distributed within puredata itself? > > hmm, i'd rather have the "puredata" package follow the upstream package > "pd" as closely as possible, without adding objects. > so people using "pd-vanilla" (that is: upstream pd without any > additional libraries), are 100% compatible with people using only > debian's "puredata" package.
Of course. I meant including it upstream. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
