On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 01:54:25PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > > When I compare > > > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=test.c;att=1;bug=601657 > > > > to the code in jackd1's drivers/firewire/ directory or to ffado's > > tests/streaming/teststreaming3.cpp, I wonder if you might simply miss to > > fill the buffers or to iterate/wait for FFADO. > > It is intentionally missing. It is a timing related bug, it triggers
> When libffado2 notices that a buffer hasn't been filled in time, I > would expect it to report that error to the application, instead of > crashing. Ah, now I get it. If you compile with DEBUG=0, then assert() is a NOP and your test program finishes cleanly: 2145932376749: Warning (IsoHandlerManager.cpp)[ 282] Execute: Timeout while waiting for activity 2145933300504: Fatal (IsoHandlerManager.cpp)[ 338] Execute: (0x993d2d8, Receive) Handler died: now: 4D7DE6B8, last: 497BF381, diff: 49248055 (max: 49152000) 2145933300551: Warning (StreamProcessor.cpp)[ 126] handlerDied: Handler died for 0x993b8c8 2145934300663: Warning (IsoHandlerManager.cpp)[ 282] Execute: Timeout while waiting for activity 2145934310756: Fatal (IsoHandlerManager.cpp)[ 338] Execute: (0x993d1a8, Transmit) Handler died: now: 4F83093E, last: 49654344, diff: 75191802 (max: 49152000) 2145934310785: Warning (StreamProcessor.cpp)[ 126] handlerDied: Handler died for 0x993c130 no message buffer overruns So I guess it's me to blame for shipping a DEBUG-enabled FFADO version in Debian. OTOH, this was intended: http://bugs.debian.org/572141 We should probably come up with a clean solution, so we have both versions in Debian. Can you confirm that test.c doesn't trigger the bug when ffado is compiled without DEBUG? TIA -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers