On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:39:07AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:08, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote:On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:18:23PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:> We need not change anything now, just use a more meaningful tag > than "" next time we want to bump.I think this makes most sense. (although it does require renaming libjack-dev to libjack-jackd1-dev and making it Provide: libjack-dev).Is that required now? I don't think so. Policy 7.5:
[elaboration snipped]
So long story short: it seems the only change reguired right now is the updated jackd2 package with libjack-jackd2-dev "Provides: libjack-dev".And that's already built and waiting for an upload on my system. Just give me the "OK" in case you agree. ;)Yes. But when libjack${tag}-dev appears, libjack-dev needs to be renamed to something less generic, to allow people to require jackd1 if they really need to.
I think noone disagrees with that. Note "right now" and similar expressions in Adrians text that you quoted here above. :-)
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
