On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 12:18:27PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 2, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 12:58:57PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
[snip]
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 01:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:I am wondering about the strip stuff:
[snip]
I was under the impression that dh would set the strip options in the $(INSTALL_PROGRAM) for the Makefile, so that an explicit strip wasn't necessary. Is that true? If so, I'll change up the pd packages to use INSTALL_PROGRAM and INSTALL_DATA properly. I don't know why I didn't do this to begin with.No, debhelper does not interfere with $(INSTALL_PROGRAM). For Debian packaging binaries should not be stripped during build - then dh_strip should deal with stripping afterwards.Problem is, the unusual filenames goes below the radar of dh_strip, and (according to Felipe) dh_strip cannot be spoonfed additional files to strip.Makes sense. My question is: does it make sense to maintain a manual strip target like this? Could we run into cross-arch issues with the strip target, for example?
For Debian packages we should...: * Avoid stripping during build * Strip during install if DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS does not contain nostrip More details - and example code - in Debian Policy v3.9.1 ยง4.9.1. (too lazy to find a URL - I read /usr/share/doc/debian-policy myself) Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers