On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabrb...@gmail.com> wrote:ABI back-compatibility has never been assured - if a program was linked against JACK API M.N.m and the runtime installation is a version earlier than that, there may be problems as you noted. the new rules on weak symbols post the 0.118.0 API should help address this.
Do I understand above correctly so that in fact jackd2 1.9.5 cannot be trusted to support library API (and ABI) of 0.116.2 but only that of 0.118.0?
Tell me if better that I ask upstream such questions. For now I would prefer this list acting as proxy for my perhaps too silly[1] questions.
- Jonas[1] No question is too silly to be asked, I know. But some might be silly enough that others than busy upstream developers can answer. :-)
-- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers