On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:35:28AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:55:20AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If I get no response on this by sunday, and noone else objects, I will go ahead with my proposed plan.
I've tried to follow this as closely as I can, but I am new to packaging so not qualified to discuss the specifics.However, from what I do understand I do not see a consensus, yet. Also, I would ask that we restate and clarify the proposed scheme and give upstream a chance to comment.NB: though torben is truly awesome, he is not the only upstream developer.
Thanks for the response. I shall not touch the libjack packaging (even step one that I find glaring and obvious) until others have explicitly requested so and not been disputed by others on this list.
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
