On 10 April 2010 15:22, Harry Rickards <ha...@linux.com> wrote: > On 10 April 2010 15:03, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 14:39:54 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Friday, April 9, 2010, Alessio Treglia <quadris...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> did you mean to write 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64'? Debian does not have >>>>> a pure 64bit sparc port (yet). >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think Harry actually means sparc64, 'cause of this failure [1]. >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lives#fail-lives-sparc64 >>> >>> >>> Yeah I did. Any advice on what to do? >> >> file a bug against lintian to make sparc64 a recognized architecture? >> > > > The bug's already been filed > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563495) and fixed in > v2.3.4. Lintian 2.3.4 doesn't give me this error. Alessio, can you > upgrade to 2.3.4 (in unstable and testing) and confirm that? The error > is reported at lintian.debian.org, however lintian.debian.org says > it's running 2.3.4. Is there a way to request a rescan of lives using > the new version or similar? >
Alternatively, because lives can't enter testing because of the build failure on mipsel which should be fixed in the patches I added in Git, would it be better just to upload a new Debian revision (1.3.2-2)? -- Harry Rickards - ha...@linux.com Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain - http://libdems.org.uk _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
