On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:24:49AM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > >> On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version would > >> be preferred over a more featureful one. > > Unfortunately, this is only half of the story. For the occasional use of > > jack, jackd2 is easier to use, because it can suspend pulseaudio. > > Let me add a third half to the story then :-) Lennart (as in the > PulseAudio developer) came up with an idea of reserving / letting go of > audio devices via calls over D-Bus. This is not implemented in jack1. > I haven't tested jackd2, but I believe it is implemented there. > > I don't think any of them actually *suspends* PulseAudio.
This is what I was talking about. It's device reservation via D-Bus, and it requires jackdbus from the jackd2 package to work. -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
