On Do, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:36:31 (CET), Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Petr Salinger <petr.salin...@seznam.cz> > wrote: >> I propose >> >> package snd-gtk-pulse everywhere, on linux uses ALSA, on GNU/kFreeBSD OSS >> package snd-gtk-jack on i386 amd64 powerpc CPUs, i.e. also on kfreebsd-amd64 >> and kfreebsd-i386 >> package snd-nox everywhere, on linux uses ALSA, on GNU/kFreeBSD OSS > > Agreed. > Do we really need to change the name? Could we simply leave > snd-nox-alsa unchanged and build it with different configurations on > Linux and kFreeBSD?
if that means to make the snd-nox-alsa package to use oss on kFreeBSD, then I'd object to that idea. That would cause too much confusion IMO. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
