Confirmed.
Please cancel this mistaken bug report.
An old version of lame was lurking in local $HOME/bin path.
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:05:59 +0100
From: Fabian Greffrath <[email protected]>
To: J.D. <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#924898: lame 3.100-2+b1 missing dependency on libncurses
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2019, 21:58 -0500 schrieb J.D.:
Package: lame
$ lame --version
lame: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.5: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
Well, that's strange, because the lame binary in Debian isn't even linked
against libncurses:
_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
