Hi! On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 at 03:53, Aurélien COUDERC <li...@coucouf.fr> wrote: > > Dear Team, > > we currently have plasma 5.27.2 in bookworm, 5.27.3 in experimental and > Patrick and I will be updating experimental with new upstream bugfix versions > as they come by. > > I tried to get an unblock pre-approval for Frameworks 5.104 with #1033271 and > got a NACK but in my opinion not for the good reasons – difficulty for the > release team to review / unblock that number of packages.
I must agree with the RT here, this comes too late in the release cycle. > I'm *not* trying again with Plasma. I don't have better arguments than for > Frameworks and I don't expect the same kind of inputs to get a different > output. > > So I'm reaching out to the team, maybe someone here can have a better idea on > how to proceed. > Further Plasma 5.27.x releases have *loads* of fixes including important > crashers and screen management-related fixes which would be a shame not to > have in bookworm and would make the release strictly lower quality. > > I'm slowly going through Frameworks releases and backporting seemingly > important fixes on top of 5.103 but it feels like self-inflicted pain so > motivation is low. > I'm *not* doing it for Plasma where the number of commits to backport would > be even higher than Frameworks, and probably more intricate too. If I understand correctly this will be the last Qt5-based Plasma release. If this is it, and as long as it does not require any transition (rebuild existing binaries mostly) I would perhaps think of an official backport. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer https://perezmeyer.com.ar/ -- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
