----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andres Salomon" <dilin...@queued.net> > To: "Soren Stoutner" <so...@stoutner.com> > Cc: 1020...@bugs.debian.org, "Dmitry Shachnev" <mity...@debian.org>, "Agustin > Martin" <agmar...@debian.org>, "Debian > Qt/KDE Maintainers" <pkg-kde-talk@alioth-lists.debian.net>, "Roland > Rosenfeld" <rol...@debian.org>, "Rene Engelhard" > <r...@debian.org>, "Mattia Rizzolo" <mat...@debian.org>, "Debian Chromium > Team" <chrom...@packages.debian.org>, > "Timothy Pearson" <tpear...@raptorengineering.com> > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2022 2:33:52 PM > Subject: Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the > packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary > dictionaries
> On Mon, Dec 26 2022 at 10:32:20 AM -0700, Soren Stoutner > <so...@stoutner.com> wrote: >> Dmitry >> >> >> It hasn’t been discussed, but I think it would make sense for >> Chromium to ship the convert_dict tool as it is the upstream for the >> project. I suppose the reason why the discussion was around how it >> is shipped in the Qt packages was because that is the only place it >> is currently shipped in Debian: >> >> >> <https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=convert_dict&mode=path&suite=testing&arch=any> >> >> >> Andres, do you have an comments on the feasibility of shipping >> convert_dict as part of a Chromium package targeted at developers? >> >> > > > It's definitely feasible*. However, there's the question of whether we > want other important packages depending on chromium. > https://bugs.debian.org/1004441 shows that it's still an outstanding > question whether chromium will even ship in bookworm. I now have Tim > helping with packaging, which is wonderful and a huge help (thanks > Tim!), but he doesn't have upload privs. For what it's worth I'm interested in obtaining upload privileges to further assist, but I think I need a sponsor etc. for that process? Thanks! -- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
