On 11/10/2013 10:22, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 11/05/13 17:46, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: >>>> Hi Jérémy, >>>> >>>> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>>>> On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jérémy, >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? >>>>> When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, >>>>> all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. >>>>> >>>>> The current status is : >>>>> >>>>> * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental >>>>> * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough >>>>> * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... >>>>> Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons >>>>> be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. >>>>> >>>>> However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a >>>>> lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably >>>>> better be using it in testing/sid. >>>> thanks for the feedback ;) >>>> >>>> >>>>> Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. >>>> Yes, I will try it. >>> >>> I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of >>> nodejs is feasible? >>> >>> I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy >>> and all seems OK >> Do you backport libv8 too ? > > Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy > > It has a version of libv8 depending on libc >= 2.14 - I simply pulled > the packages selectively from testing some months ago > > Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? >
I didn't but i can't see a reason why it wouldn't work smoothly. Jérémy. _______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
