Le 23/12/2020 à 13:28, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-12-23 13:06:40) >> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 12:28:53) >>> Le 23/12/2020 à 12:19, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>> Quoting Xavier (2020-12-23 11:34:41) >>>>> node-commander 6 is ready in experimental. It seems that all is >>>>> OK, except a little change in uglifyjs.terser help output >>>>> detected by your Perl test. >>>>> I posted a simple MR, could you see if this is acceptable >>>>> (compatible with node-commander 5)? >>>> >>>> Please attach proposed patch to an email. Preferably as a >>>> bugreport. >> >>> With commander 6, uglifyjs.terser displays: >>> >>> Usage: uglifyjs [options]... >>> >>> instead of: >>> >>> Usage: uglifyjs.terser [options]... >>> >>> I don't know if my patch is useful here: it replaced your test regex >>> with a more tolerant one without fixing the real issue (if this is an >>> issue?). >> >> Ah, thanks - that is a helpful detail. >> >> No, I don't think that is an issue needed any further work than >> wriggling the terser test a bit. >> >> Please go ahead (assuming no issues elsewhere) with the node-commander >> upgrade - i.e. don't wait for terser, I will handle that from there. > > Oh! This still is just a mailinglist conversation, not a bugreport :-( > > @Xavier, would you mind filing this as a proper bugreport, please? > > Or tell me if that is too uch hassle for you, then I will do it, but > prefor to give you credit for your work. > > In case you wonder: No, this is not just bureaucratic busywork: I am in > the middle of other work with the terser package (and a pile of other > work with other packages, including the mess I made with symlink-to-dir > removals), and tracking issues with the bugtracker truly helps.
Hi, can I upload node-commander to unstable or do you prefer to push node-terser first ? Regards, Xavier -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
