On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 16:46, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote:
Sounds reasonable to introduce psl as new _binary_ package (not embed
in
_binary_ package node-though-cookie and add "Provides: node-psl"
hint):
Upstream project has many seemingly unrelated reverse dependencies
which
are probably not all also depending on node-though-cookie, so it would
be annoying to have those needlessly pull in node-though-cookie.
Sounds reasonable to instroduce psl as new _source_ package (not embed
in src:node-though-cookie): It isn't tiny.
I don't think that is what ftp masters wants. They have communicated
this clearly and lots of NEW packages were rejected as well.
I quote again "- put together packages that belong together; I am not
sure here, but
wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or node-babel
that contains all corresponding modules (though their different
versions
might create problems in keeping track of them)?"
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/2018-September/027849.html
If you are proposing something that is against the recommendation of
ftp masters, you really need to convince them. In case of NEW, their
decision matters, not yours.
It is fine if you don't agree with their decision. But you will need to
override it before proposing something that is against their preference.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
