Hi Markus,

Thanks for your work on this, I noticed a few minor issues though.

On 2016-05-30 09:09, Markus Wanner wrote:
 Package: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.2
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, postgresql-9.5,
- postgresql-9.5-postgis-scripts, liblwgeom-2.2-5,
+ postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.2-scripts, liblwgeom-2.2-5,
  ${misc:Depends}
 Recommends: postgresql-contrib-9.5
 Suggests: postgis
@@ -118,14 +118,12 @@ Description: Geographic objects support for PostgreSQL 9.5
  .
  This package supports PostgreSQL 9.5.

-Package: postgresql-9.5-postgis-scripts
+Package: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.2-scripts
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}
-Recommends: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.2
-Replaces: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.0-scripts (<< 2.1.0~),
- postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.1-scripts (<< 2.1.0-4~)
-Breaks: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.0-scripts (<< 2.1.0~),
- postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.1-scripts (<< 2.1.0-4~)
+Recommends: postgresql-9.5-postgis

The version should not be dropped from the -postgis package, that should remain:

 Recommends: postgresql-9.5-postgis-2.2

+Replaces: postgresql-9.5-postgis-scripts,
+Breaks: postgresql-9.5-postgis-scripts

Breaks/Replaces needs to use a version constraint. The following should be sufficient:

 Replaces: postgresql-9.5-postgis-scripts (<< 2.2.2+dfsg-3~)
 Breaks: postgresql-9.5-postgis-scripts (<< 2.2.2+dfsg-3~)

Kind Regards,

Bas

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to