On 19-07-15 20:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 07/03/2015 03:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package >> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might >> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built >> against these packages. > > This is the case for pktools. It has no reverse dependencies, and I'm > not worried about possible software outside the Debian archive. > > When the new libstdc++ is moved to unstable, we only need to update the > symbols for all architectures.
It's currently not possible to build pktools due to libboost-date-time1.55.0 & libdap being uninstallable. I have the symbols updated for amd64 with GCC 5 ready in git, but that cant' be uploaded yet. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
