Author: gmascellani-guest
Date: 2009-05-21 22:14:07 +0000 (Thu, 21 May 2009)
New Revision: 2227
Modified:
packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian
Log:
Information on many plugins filled
Modified: packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian
===================================================================
--- packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian 2009-05-21 16:01:26 UTC
(rev 2226)
+++ packages/josm-plugins/trunk/debian/TODO.Debian 2009-05-21 22:14:07 UTC
(rev 2227)
@@ -1,18 +1,83 @@
* Add more plugins: which are the problems?
+ + cadastre_fr
+ - license: MAYBE, there is GPL-2 license file, but nothing is said in
sources
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + create_grid_of_ways
+ - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + DirectUpload
+ - license: GPL, version not specified, although there is the text of GPL-2
(Copyright by Subhodip Biswas)
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ editgpx
- - license: OK, GPL (Copyright 2008. Martin Garbe (leo at running-sheep dot
com))
+ - license: GPL, version not specified (Copyright 2008. Martin Garbe (leo
at running-sheep dot com))
- build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + globalsat
+ - license: quite confusing. In plugin root there is a LICENSE file, that
states
+ the plugin is "copyrighted 2007-2009 by Stafan Kaintoch and Raphael Mack
<ram...@raphael-mack.de>"
+ and is distributed GPL-3+. Many .java files are copyrighted by Kaintoch
or Mack
+ and don't specify any license. A file (copyright by Mack), says
"License: GPL v2 or later (v3 preferred)"
+ and another (copyrighted by Mack and Immanuel Scholz) is GPL-2+. I think
+ redistribution of the whole plugin is allowed under GPL-3+ terms.
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch and specification of build
dependencies
+ - dependencies: depends on rxtx, which is in Debian
+ grid
- license: unknown, copyright holder too
- build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + imagewaypoint
+ - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + lakewalker
+ - license: unclear. Some files are "Copyright (c) 2000-2007 by Rodney
Kinney, Brent Easton"
+ and LGPL (version unknown), other have no copyright or license
specification
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + nearclick
+ - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ openstreetbugs
- license: OK, seems to be 3-clause BSD or something like (Copyright (c)
2008, Henrik Niehaus)
- build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + osmarender
+ - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ - dependencies: Firefox or other browser?
+ + piclayer
+ - license: OK, GPL-2+ (Copyright (C) 2009 by Tomasz Stelmach)
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + plastic_laf
+ - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ - dependencies: depends on looks, which is in Debian
+ + remotecontrol
+ - license: MAYBE, GPL-2+ and copyright holder (Frederik Ramm) stated in
+ LICENSE and CONTRIBUTION files, but not on source files themselves.
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ routing
- - license: MAYBE: GPL-2+ text is clearly stated, but copyright string
+ - license: MAYBE, GPL-2+ text is clearly stated, but copyright string
(Copyright (C) 2008 Innovant) is not very precise. Is it enough?
- build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch and specification of build
dependencies
- dependencies: depends on jgraph and log4j, which are both in Debian
+ + tageditor
+ - licese: copyright holder unknown; LICENSE contains GPL-2 text, but no
+ indication of license is present on sources
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ + tcxplugin
+ - license: quite confusing. A source says "License: GPL. For details, see
LICENSE file.",
+ but there is no LICENSE file. It reports no copyright holder indication.
+ Conversely, the other states "(c) Copyright by M.IT 2002-2008" and has a
link
+ to www.emaitie.de, but without telling nothing about the license
+ - build.xml: MAYBE. The build.xml could be used as is, just like most of
the
+ other plugins (with the usual anti-SVN patch), but many source files
appears
+ to be generated automatically by JAXB. build.xml doesn't take care of
+ regenerating them, but I think we should, as these sources aren't really
+ a "source", but rather an intermediate form. So build.xml needs patching
+ and I don't know how extensively this must be done.
+ - dependencies: depends on JAXB, which I think is not available in Debian;
I don't
+ know whether libjaxme-java is an acceptable alternative. Morover
tcxplugin
+ depends on jsr173: libjsr107cache-java is in Debian, are they the same
thing?
+ + terracer
+ - license: two files say "Copyright 2009 CloudMade Ltd." and are GPL-2.
Another
+ file has no indications. The LICENSE file contains the text of GPL-2.
+ - build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
+ usertools
- - license: unknown, copyright holder too
+ - license: unknown, copyright holder unknown too
- build.xml: OK, needs anti-SVN patch
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
