Hi,

Am Sonntag, den 04.01.2015, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kurtz:
> On Sat, 2014-11-22 at 16:40 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > It would be nice to find out what was causing this and, if there is a
> > risk that this will happen again, use some mechanism to avoid this.
> > But again, there are likely more important things to do.
> 
> after reading this blog post
> 
>       
> https://people.debian.org/~lunar/blog/posts/reproducible_builds_against_rc_bugs/
> 
> I'd like to send this to [email protected]:
> 
>       reassign 769874 libical1
>       forcemerge 773916 766454 769874
>       thanks
> 
> Do you agree?

Well, 773916 is closed, so if you want to merge them, does that mean
that all problems are solved for jessie?


Looking at my evolution calendar at the moment, I see the bug:

libecal-1.2-16 3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2
libical1 1.0-1.2

Maybe it is just a matter of binNMUs, but someone really needs to make
sure that we ship jessie with a working combination.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
  JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Pkg-evolution-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-evolution-maintainers

Reply via email to