On dim., 2010-08-08 at 21:19 -0400, Robert Tomsick wrote: > On Sunday 08 August 2010 17:14:55 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On dim., 2010-08-08 at 16:45 -0400, Robert Tomsick wrote: > > > Please let me know if anything else is needed. > > > > A backtrace (as reportbug should have told you, did it?). And it will be > > really faster if you also report upstream directly. > > Sorry about that. I'm still rather new at bug-reporting. I've attached a > backtrace to this message.
Hmhm, I see nothing evolution-related in this backtrace. It might be worth trying something like: thread apply all backtrace full in gdb. > > > It might help to provide the relevant mbox, though 350M of private mail > > won't exactly be easy to provide I guess. > > You're right -- attaching the mbox in question isn't really an option for a > couple reasons. > > Since I can't reproduce the crash with some of the smaller mbox files I have, > I'm assuming it's size-dependent. It might be related to some mail too, thought the errors message seem to lead to a memory size too large indeed. -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-evolution-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-evolution-maintainers
