Hi Yves-Alexis, I draw your attention to:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/developer-duties.html#upstream-coordination Specifically the second sentence of the first paragraph, which you appear to have forgotten, where it says: You have to forward these bug reports to the upstream developers... I note that the construction "have to" should probably read as "MUST" instead, as per RFC usage, but it is reasonably definite even as it is. If we start discouraging bugs on the basis that we're rather busy, then the knowledge contained in the bugs will be lost, and will be unavailable to others who find the same bug. Since you are confident that it's an upstream issue, it is to your advantage to have it recorded in the BTS and marked as forwarded upstream, as that should prevent the next person to find it from bothering you, and you never know, it might even get fixed. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
pgpYYE5YMMOfA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-evolution-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-evolution-maintainers
