Hi, On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 09:51:45PM +0100, pvane...@debian.org wrote: > > > Sure, once we agree on a workflow, I am willing to document it (with > > > command-line examples) on a wiki page. > > > > You certainly have my blessing as you’re also doing most, if not all, of > > the difficult work! > > I wrote the following page documenting in detail the proposed workflow: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp/GitPackaging > > I also migrated the sbcl repository to salsa so that you can play with the > example given in the wiki page. > > Please read the page and tell me if this workflow is ok with you. > > Then, unless there is something to be changed, I'll go ahead with the > migration > of all repositories to salsa (adapting the branch names in the process, and > creating the pristine-tar branches).
I got no reply to my email above. Should I assume that the git workflow is ok for the team and that I should complete the migration to salsa? (I already migrated a few packages that I uploaded in the meantime). Best, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
