Sébastien Villemot <sebast...@debian.org> writes: > I don't think the stack direction is the problem, because upstream is well > aware of all these architectural details.
As I said, it may be a red herring; I'm just throwing it out there. > I would be happy to debug this, but according to db.debian.org, there is no > hppa porterbox (same for m68k, sh4 and powerpcspe). Perhaps you could do something with qemu or ask porters or upstream about temporary access to whatever systems they use. (I'm not a porter or autobuilder maintainer, just a regular DD who's been reporting bugs based on buildd.d.o logs for source packages that recently introduced new binary packages to unstable for amd64 or i386.) Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu _______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
