On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
Hello Faheem,
On 09 Oct 2012, at 07:06, Faheem Mitha <fah...@faheem.info> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Christoph Egger wrote:
I'm sorry to not responding to your requests for comment. It's
currently rather hard for me to free some more time for Debian so I'm
not really active currently. though I'll try to free an evening this
week looking at ccl -- I'm really looking forward to having a ccl
package!
I fear that I'm also having quite a bit of RL work to handle and my
Debian time is rather limited.
The situation is not helped by CCL being so 'different'. Just getting
started by downloading the source is a jarring experience.
I mean a different svn branch per architecture? How can we handle that?
Debian expects that we give a 'pristine' tar.gz of upstream, without
binaries... Then we get to the 'rebuild gcc' as part of the build part
:(.
Still I think you did a lot of good work and having CCL would indeed be
cool... I just wish I could be more effective in this :(.
No problem. CCL is indeed idiosyncratic, and the maintainers are not
especially helpful, or flexible... The word grouchy comes to mind. Also
grumpy.
I was thinking of putting an apt repository of CCL somewhere. That way
people can try it out. Alioth seems a natural place, and the folks at
#debian-mentors told me that should be possible, Does anyone here have an
opinion of a good location for this?
Also, it might be helpful if I could be added to the common lisp group on
alioth. Thanks.
Regards, Faheem
_______________________________________________
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
