Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2011 18:18:22 +0200
with message-id <20110902161822.ga23...@agmartin.aq.upm.es>
and subject line Re: Bug#633358: removing libreadline5-dev breaks build of clisp
has caused the Debian Bug report #633358,
regarding removing libreadline5-dev breaks build of clisp
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
633358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633358
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:readline5
Version: 5.2-9
Severity: critical

Removal of libreadline5-dev made clisp release-buggy -- as it no
longer builds from source in unstable. There was no notification of
reverse dependencies and no rational for the rename given ever.

Regards

    Christoph

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.49-8

On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 06:22:53PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: src:readline5
> Version: 5.2-9
> Severity: critical
> 
> Removal of libreadline5-dev made clisp release-buggy -- as it no
> longer builds from source in unstable. There was no notification of
> reverse dependencies and no rational for the rename given ever.

Looking at changelog for last clisp,

clisp (1:2.49-8) unstable; urgency=low

  * Replace dependency on libreadline5-dev with libreadline-gplv2-dev to
    follow that sensless rename

which should fix #633358. Closing bug report. Please reopen and sorry for
the noise if I missed something.

Regards,

-- 
Agustin


--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list
pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel

Reply via email to