Hi Darren and Christoph, On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 20:43, Christoph Egger <christ...@debian.org> wrote: > Darren Hoo <darren....@gmail.com> writes: > >> I am wondering whether it is neccessary to integrate it with >> common-lisp-controller >> since abcl is running on JVM, it does not have the schemes like other CL >> implementations that support dumping core/image. > > Maybe someone else can help here?
c-l-c has been deprecated in sid now. I posted a c-l-c redesign plan [1] last month. In fact, finally, c-l-c will be *deleted*. So ABCL *should not* depend on c-l-c. Generally, all the implementations, which have included ASDF2, don't have to work with c-l-c and cl-asdf. For those not including ASDF2, they can choose: 1. Build-Depends cl-asdf, then load it when compiling the image. 2. PreDepends cl-asdf, then load it when installing the image. 3. Depends cl-asdf, then load it when running the image. 4. patch asdf by themselves. 5. don't include asdf at all. I don't follow mentors. Please CC your reply to [2]. Any opinion about c-l-c redesign please reply to that thread [1]. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.alioth.common-lisp/2431 [2] pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org Thanks, Des _______________________________________________ pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list pkg-common-lisp-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-common-lisp-devel
