This one time, at band camp, Philipp Kern said: > ken, > > am Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:58:24AM -0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > Does this mean that people that use Lenny will no longer get "Volatile" > > updates? Our mail servers are running Lenny (and will not upgrade till we > > see a more stable Squeeze) and I know that we could use a new version of > > Clamav (version .97). > > in theory they get updates if the clamav-team would actually bother. I > forwarded the complaints to them and they don't answer. It would be cool > if there would be at least a "it's unsupported" answer now, or "something's > in preparation" (Cc'ed).
So, what are we doing with volatile in general? I understand you'd prefer not to keep using that mechanism for squeeze? I haven't heard any mention on this list, so it might be useful to outline what you (as RM and volatile admin) would like to see from us. Once we know a bit more what that is, we'll probably be more inclined to 'bother'. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [email protected] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
