Michael Tautschnig schrieb: ... > Ok, maybe the Debian package could have been more verbose about this. But > essentially this was upstream's decision and we're not going to revert this > because the old milter was broken in several ways.
If you want such things, take > amavis and use clamav as the backend. If you prefer to stick with > clamav-milter, > see > > http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20090326.132413.b9e348ec.hu.html > > for some suggestions. > > Best, > Michael > So I will have to change a really well working email system without any reason. Changing configurations wouldn't have been a problem. Removing functionality without providing alternatives is. None of the alternative solutions recommended by the clamav folks are in any way that simple and easy to setup than the clamav-milter was. Whatsoever, this is nothing debian specific so thanks a lot for helping me. Waiting 20 months for the debian distribution to stabilize and the first upgrade breaks the system. Should have been a dist-upgrade then. There really is no need for debian if things are going that road now. It were the great debian packages decoupling the distribution from any upstream insanity I chose it for. Btw, the clamav upgrade really brought a /etc/default/clamav-milter file with it. This new file contains the line RESTART_AFTER_CLAMD=yes and as soon as this is set to yes, clamav-milter cannot be started anymore stating a warning that clamd may be needed and that it will be started by clamd. clamav-milter will not be started by clamd for me. -- Christian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
