In that case, I think ":" would be better. Visually and in line with
some functional languages, "->" could also be an option, except that
it maybe feels a bit too different from what that tokens means in
other contexts in Pike.
  • Abb... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
    • ... Peter Bortas @ Pike developers forum
      • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
        • ... Martin Nilsson (Coppermist) @ Pike (-) developers forum
          • ... Jonas Walld�n @ Pike developers forum
            • ... Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum
              • ... Leif Stensson, Lysator @ Pike developers forum

Reply via email to