On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:52 PM Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 2021-03-23 09:38:59, Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:02 AM Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > > > > > > Trying to pick this discussion back up. Daniel Stone thinks it's a > > > half hour of API bashing to retarget all the MRs so, if the fd.o > > > admins have some heads up, it should be tractable. Should we do this > > > right after branching 21.1 along with the LTS branch? > > > > +1 > > Jason, > > I opened a related Mesa issue: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/4501 > > I made this change in crucible, and used a script to update the 7 MR > target branches: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/crucible/-/issues/5 > > As mentioned in the Mesa issue, I think we should use piglit as > another test run before changing Mesa: > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/piglit/-/issues/50 > > Piglit currently has 60 open merge requests.
I'm in favor of branch rename, but was in the camp of "hope gitlab comes up with a way to make this easy for us".. but as far as fallback plan, converting trees with fewer outstanding MRs first seems like a pretty good idea so solid +1 for that BR, -R _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
