On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com> wrote: > > Quoting Jan Vesely (2019-06-28 13:01:36) > > From: Jan Vesely <jano.ves...@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jano.ves...@gmail.com> > > --- > > framework/test/piglit_test.py | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/framework/test/piglit_test.py b/framework/test/piglit_test.py > > index b4e6eb444e0..0881f00a6d6 100644 > > --- a/framework/test/piglit_test.py > > +++ b/framework/test/piglit_test.py > > @@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ class PiglitCLTest(PiglitBaseTest): # pylint: > > disable=too-few-public-methods > > > > """ > > def __init__(self, command, run_concurrent=CL_CONCURRENT, **kwargs): > > - self.timeout = 60 > > + if self.timeout is None: > > + self.timeout = 60 > > Sorry I wont have time to look closer at this till Monday. I think if you put > the timeout at the class level it will just work. At least, that's how I seem > to > remember designing it to work, but it's been a while.
There's time, the current limit should be enough for most users. I tried setting a class timeout attribute in PigliTCLTest, but it didn't work. iiuc, the cmdline value updates the parent class timeout (base.Test.timeout) However, when accessing self.timeout the child value (PiglitCLTest.timeout) is used and takes precedence, thus always overriding the cmline value. Jan > > Dylan > > > super(PiglitCLTest, self).__init__(command, run_concurrent, > > **kwargs) > > > > > > -- > > 2.21.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
