Actually CC'ing him this time....
Quoting Dylan Baker (2017-09-29 20:29:34) > Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2017-09-26 03:27:50) > > Because in Python we have `bool([]}) == False`, providing empty test > > list resulted in hitting the same code path as not providing it at all, > > meaning that we run everything. > > > > Let's just exit early with an appropriate message instead. > > > > This will get rid of the rather surprising behavior and will help making > > the execution less prone to automated list generation errors (which has > > already bitten us) as well as human errors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com> > > --- > > framework/programs/run.py | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/framework/programs/run.py b/framework/programs/run.py > > index 4524f171b..0fec264ec 100644 > > --- a/framework/programs/run.py > > +++ b/framework/programs/run.py > > @@ -327,6 +327,10 @@ def run(input_): > > stripped = (t.split('#')[0].strip() for t in test_list) > > forced_test_list = [t for t in stripped if t] > > > > + # to avoid running everything > > + if not forced_test_list: > > + raise exceptions.PiglitFatalError("Empty test list > > provided") > > + > > backend = backends.get_backend(args.backend)( > > args.results_path, > > junit_suffix=args.junit_suffix, > > -- > > 2.13.5 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Piglit mailing list > > Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit > > Hmmm, there is a case that we do want to continue, and that's for resume, > CC'ing > Martin to see if this breaks their use case. > > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit