On 09/02/2015 01:27 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote: > On 02/09/15 20:51, Dylan Baker wrote: >> This was never added to all.py > > Yes, that was because the test uses random numbers, hence might yield > variable results (fail once, pass another). > > Rather than all.py, it probably makes sense to move this sort of tests > to a new stress.py test-list. > > The other alternative is use reproduceable pseudo-random numbers, or a > pre-generated set of data from a plaintext file.
There is such a random number generator in piglit, but it looks like it's only available for C++ tests (tests/util/mersenne.hpp). It should be easy enough to make it available to C tests. > Jose > >> cc: José Fonseca <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> Does this actually need run_concurrent=False? >> >> tests/all.py | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/tests/all.py b/tests/all.py >> index 9c55dd7..ca72b65 100644 >> --- a/tests/all.py >> +++ b/tests/all.py >> @@ -2249,6 +2249,7 @@ with profile.group_manager( >> PiglitGLTest, >> grouptools.join('spec', 'ARB_robustness')) as g: >> g(['arb_robustness_client-mem-bounds'], run_concurrent=False) >> + g(['arb_robustness_draw-vbo-bounds'], run_concurrent=False) >> >> # Group ARB_shader_texture_lod >> with profile.group_manager( > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
