But should the test be moved to a group different from "!opengl 1.5"?
On 4 September 2015 at 19:15, Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian Paul <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 09/02/2015 11:45 AM, Albert Freeman wrote: >>> The draw-sync test (from 2011) in the tests/general directory was never >>> placed in all.py. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Albert Freeman <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> quick.py finishes with draw-sync passing >>> This is an RFC since I placed the test in "!opengl 1.5" (since similar >>> looking tests were there). >>> >>> tests/all.py | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/tests/all.py b/tests/all.py >>> index fcfc5cd..2c61676 100644 >>> --- a/tests/all.py >>> +++ b/tests/all.py >>> @@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ with profile.group_manager( >>> g(['draw-elements', 'user'], 'draw-elements-user', >>> run_concurrent=False) >>> g(['draw-vertices'], run_concurrent=False) >>> g(['draw-vertices', 'user'], 'draw-vertices-user', >>> run_concurrent=False) >>> + g(['draw-sync'], run_concurrent=False) >>> g(['isbufferobj'], run_concurrent=False) >>> g(['depth-tex-compare'], run_concurrent=False) >>> g(['gl-1.5-normal3b3s-invariance', 'GL_BYTE'], >>> >> >> I'm not sure this has to be run non-concurrently. Eric was the original >> author. Eric? > > I think it would be fine concurrent. _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
