Cool, I was mostly hoping that you and Daniel would look at them and see if they worked for you and didn't break your workflow.
- Dylan On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 02:34:57 Marek Olšák wrote: > I cannot review this, because I'm not familiar with the code, but the > last patch looks good to me and I like the overall idea. > > Marek > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > This series separates the SKIP and NOTRUN status changes from fixes and > > regressions and puts them into separate categories, enabled and > > disabled. > > > > This makes two workflows possible where previously only one was: > > 1) creating baselines that are full tests, and then using small focused > > > > runs to compare specific tests > > > > 2) running full comparisons, and being able to see when new tests are > > > > enabled or tests are disabled > > > > Patches 1-3 add test to demonstrate current behavior or to model future > > behavior > > > > Patch 4 makes NOTRUN and SKIP a special subclass which when compared > > using numerics (not == or !=) will resolve False > > > > Patch 5 Plumbs it all in
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
